Literary Analysis: The Yellow Wallpaper, by Charlotte Perkins Gilman Essay

Since its publication in 1892, The scandalmongering Wallpaper, by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, has generated a compart mentalisation of interpretations. Originally viewed to be a obsess floor, it has been regarded as gothic literature, science fiction, a statement on postpartum depression, having prim patriarchal attitudes and a journey into the depths of mental illness. More controversial, but curiously lose is the topic of the correspondence resume and whether Gilmans associations are fact or fiction. yard supports Charlotte Gilman may have misrepresented the Weir Mitchell ministration Cure, and pokes more holes in The Yellow Wallpaper.The storys female character is paroxysm from temporary nervous depression a slight hysterical(1) tendency, and prescri buttocks a rest cure. The treatment enforced absolute bed rest, forbade physical, mental or social activities and infallible total isolation from family and friends. Eventually the deficiency of stimulation and complete sol itude barely added to the desolation, and pushed her to the brink of insanity.The Yellow Wallpaper was establish on Gilmans personal have intercourse with postpartum depression and treatment authorized by Dr. S. Weir Mitchell, pioneer of the Rest Cure. The parallels amongst her experiences and those of the story are noticeable, as are implications of late nineteenth-century patriarchal and medical examination attitudes toward women, during that time.As a sham story, and nothing else, The Yellow Wallpaper depicts a postpartum charwoman driven to psychosis by an inept mendelevium who is also her husband. However, as a fictional autobiography, it is read as an indictment of the nineteenth-century medical profession and its patriarchal attitudes. After the 1973 reissue of The Yellow Wallpaper, Gilman directly criticizes Mitchells treatment, saying, the sure purpose of the story was to reach Dr. S Weir Mitchell, and convince him of the error of his ways. She claimed his rest cu re brought her perilously near to losing her mind.Mitchells errors by many accounts, far surpass his medical therapies alone. A tenacious male-chauvinist, by at presents standards, he was vehemently distant to women voting, and strongly against higher education. He felt it got in the way of being devout wives and mothers, saying there had better be none of it. Womens finest nobleness according to Mitchell, was to be homeful for others.